Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Naima el Hassari et al v. Roto Rooter Corporation
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Naima eL Hassari and Aziz Kabboury
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Roto-Rooter Corporation v. Core Pacific, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04246
Plaintiff:
Roto-Rooter Corporation
Defendant:
CORE PACIFIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Roto-Rooter Corporation v. American Roto Drains & Plumbing LLC
as 3:2020cv01519
Plaintiff:
Roto-Rooter Corporation
Defendant:
American Roto Drains & Plumbing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Roto-Rooter Corporation v. Perva
as 1:2018cv01776
Plaintiff:
Roto-Rooter Corporation
Defendant:
Peter Perva
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Roto-Rooter Corporation v. Kirkland
as 4:2017cv00536
Plaintiff:
Roto-Rooter Corporation
Defendant:
Chuck Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Res-Care, Inc. v. Roto-Rooter Services Company, et al
as 11-17132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RES-CARE, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY and ROTO-ROOTER CORPORATION
Defendant:
BRADFORD-WHITE CORPORATION, LEONARD VALVE COMPANY and DOES, 1through 20, inclusive
Roto-Rooter Corporation v. Portland Plumbing & Drain, LLC
as 3:2010cv00853
Defendant:
Portland Plumbing & Drain, LLC
Plaintiff:
Roto-Rooter Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Res-Care, Inc. v. Roto-Rooter Services Company et al
as 3:2009cv03856
Plaintiff:
Res-Care, Inc., Res-Care, Inc. and Res-Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company, Roto-Rooter Corporation, Bradford-White Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
