Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Afriyie et al v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09433
Plaintiff:
Amma Afriyie and Roy Campbell
Defendant:
NBCUniversal Media, LLC and Peacock TV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 271
Campbell v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2018cv00501
Amicus Curiae:
Curtis Neal
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company Inc., Synchrony Bank and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Campbell v. Gap, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell
Defendant:
Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Campbell v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Campbell et al v. Oregon Department of State Lands et al
as 2:2016cv01677
Defendant:
Brad Avy, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell, Chad Marmolejo, Oregon Mining Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wall Street Capital Funding LLC et al
as 1:2011cv20413
Defendant:
Wall Street Capital Funding LLC , Philip Cardwell , Roy Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Mediator:
Howard Tescher
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Dennis Campbell v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-1445
Petitioner:
DENNIS ROY CAMPBELL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Roy Campbell v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-67236
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Roy Campbell, Jr., etc. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., et al.
as MSS/1:05-CV-00697
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell, Jr., etc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
