Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rozina Kimani-Muthoka v. State of Missouri, et al
as 24-1676
Plaintiff:
Rozina Kimani-Muthoka
Defendant:
State of Missouri, County of St. Louis and The Bank of New York Mellon, Trust Company
Rozina Muthoka v. League of Nations, et al
as 23-5300
Plaintiff:
Rozina Kimani Muthoka
Defendant:
League of Nations, United Nations, United States of America and others
Rozina Muthoka v. USA, et al
as 23-5298
Plaintiff:
Rozina Kimani Muthoka, In Re Executer of; In her sovereign immunity capacity, also known as Rozina Rhonda Jones Williams
Defendant:
United States of America, Union States, Missouri State and others
Muthoka v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01460
Plaintiff:
Rozina Kimani Muthoka
Defendant:
State of Missouri, County of St. Louis and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muthoka v. State of Missouri et al
as 1:2023cv08314
Plaintiff:
Rozina Kimani Muthoka
Defendant:
State of Missouri, County of St. Louis and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3305
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MUTHOKA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02436
Plaintiff:
ROZINA KIMANI MUTHOKA and ROZINA RHONDA JONES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNION STATES, MISSOURI STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUTHOKA v. LEAGUE OF NATIONS et al
as 1:2023cv02434
Plaintiff:
ROZINA-KIMANI MUTHOKA
Defendant:
LEAGUE OF NATIONS, UNITED NATIONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Procedure for Removal Criminal Prosecutions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
