Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Zimmer v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Brevan Zimmer
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Dr. John Daniel Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02763
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Floyd Bonner, Jr. and Chief Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudd v. Mays
as 2:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Latanua K. Rudd
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bowen v. RCADC et al
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Walter T. Bowen, Jr.
Defendant:
RCADC and Rudd Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ettienne v. Peralta et al
as 3:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Ettienne
Defendant:
Lt. Jason Peralta, Sgt. Adam Treinn, Supt. William Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keedy v. l/n/u et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Keedy
Defendant:
Mary l/n/u, Shawn Vanwinkle, Sharron Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02291
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Jeremiah Hoskins, DeMarcus Bush and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
