Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Porter #341649 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00916
Petitioner:
Rudolph John Porter, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brighthouse Life Insurance Company v. Rudolph
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Brighthouse Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lawrence Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Porter #341649 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00632
Petitioner:
Rudolph John Porter, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner-Gibson Incorporated et al v. Polyglass USA Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gardner-Gibson Incorporated and Gardner Asphalt Corporation
Defendant:
Polyglass USA Incorporated, Rene Lujan, Audrey Eisberg Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rudolph Johnson Family LLC v. Glendale, City of
as 2:2019cv05905
Defendant:
Glendale, City of
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Johnson Family LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Julius et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03671
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Stacy Julius and Rudolph Julius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Cano et al
as 2:2019cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jourdyn K Ford
Defendant:
Rudolph John Cano, III and Unknown Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ford v. Cano et al
as 2:2019cv00384
Plaintiff:
Jourdyn K Ford
Defendant:
Rudolph John Cano, III, Unknown Howard and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
