Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Valdiviez et al v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Javier Valdiviez and Luz Higina Ruelas Corral
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Ford Motor Company and Robert B. Gibson Auto Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Ruelas et al v. Heyward et al
as 2:2021cv00973
Plaintiff:
Estefania Ruelas and Jaime Vizcarra
Defendant:
Mason Heywood, Dolores Gomez, PHC- Las Cruces, Inc. doing business as Memorial Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruelas v. SAFECO Insurance Company of America
as 1:2021cv00397
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Ruelas
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of America
Heredia et al v. City of Las Cruces, ex rel. Las Cruces Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00565
Defendant:
Keegan Arbogast, Tate McBride, Nathan Krause and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ruelas and Kimberly Heredia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ruelas v. USA
as 1:2015cv00367
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Martin Ruelas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Osorio-Ruelas et al v. Colorado Division of Gaming et al
as 1:2011cv03106
Plaintiff:
Lorena Osorio-Ruelas and Ivan Gomez
Defendant:
Colorado Division of Gaming , Roger Schneider , Anthony Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Ruela
as 11-1406
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN MARTIN RUELAS
Ruelas-Rios v. Holder, Jr.
as 11-9523
Petitioner:
JOEL RUELAS-RIOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
United States of America v. 2003 Dodge Ram 1500 et al
as 1:2010cv01026
Defendant:
2003 Dodge Ram 1500 and 1998 Lincoln Navigator
Claimant:
Edwin Balthazar Sanchez, Carima Rivera, Edwin T. Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
