Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Downing v. Eckstrom et al
as 3:2023cv06189
Plaintiff:
Tanawah M. Downing
Defendant:
Alexander Carl Eckstrom, Diana Nicole Ruff and Alexander Carl Ekstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruff v. Warden T. Wallace
as 9:2023cv02854
Petitioner:
Eddie Ruff and Eddie J Ruff,
Respondent:
Warden T. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilder-Rhodan v. State of South Carolina, Family Court Judge Nancy C. McLin et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Sandra Wilder-Rhodan
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Family Court Judge Nancy C. McLin, Atty. J. Graham Sturgis, Jr, Atty. Veronica G. Smalls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Ruff v. Erickson
as 3:2022cv03784
Plaintiff:
Felicia Ruff
Defendant:
Donna Erickson
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Beckett v. Ruff et al
as 9:2021cv03427
Plaintiff:
Ann F Beckett
Defendant:
Charles Christopher Ruff and Sysco Columbia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewallen v. McCarley et al
as 8:2021cv01171
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward Lewallen
Defendant:
James Ruff, Timothy McCarley, Deputy John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruff v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 8:2020cv03083
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Laura K Ruff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mack v. Robbins et al
as 2:2016cv01705
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Mack
Defendant:
Robert D Robbins, St George Police Dept, Maybelle Hendricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruff v. Strategic Contract Brands Inc
as 6:2015cv05004
Plaintiff:
Kristine M Ruff
Defendant:
Strategic Contract Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Ruff et al
as 4:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ruby Wilson
Defendant:
Michael Ruff , Travis Lupton , April Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
