Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joe J. Baltas
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Terrico et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dari Garcia
Defendant:
Dr. Christine Terrico, Dr. Christopher Salas, NP Taborelli Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cintron v. Bibeault, et al
as 22-1716
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY CINTRON
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL BIBEAULT, In his Official and Individual Capacity, RUI DINIZ, in his official and individual capacity, MATTHEW KETTLE, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
LT. HAYES, in his official and individual capacity, LT. MOE, in his official and individual capacity, LT. BUSH, in his official and individual capacity and others
Shepard v. Diniz et al
as 1:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shepard
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Rui Diniz, Linda Amado, Patricia Coyne-Fague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paiva v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00499
Defendant:
Rui Diniz, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Pauline Marcussen and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Paiva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pena v. Forgue, et al
as 1:2019cv00542
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Rui Diniz, Lieutenant Moe, Counselor Joslyn and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neves v. Bibeault et al
as 1:2019cv00514
Defendant:
Paul Bibeault, "Counselor" Franco, Deputy Warden Rui Diniz and others
Plaintiff:
Davante Neves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cintron v. Bibeault et al
as 1:2019cv00497
Defendant:
Paul Bibeault, Special Investigator Cabral, Jennifer Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paiva v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
David Paiva
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Sergio Desousarosa, Rui Diniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
