Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MCKISSIC v. ZIEGLER et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
CARLTON STEVE MCKISSIC
Defendant:
Corporal SHERRY ZIEGLER, VALERIE HOLDER, R T BOREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herman Morris, Jr. v. William Rumer
as 23-13997
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM C. RUMER
MORRIS v. RUMER
as 4:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
Judge WILLIAM C RUMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELLAMY v. RUMER et al
as 4:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BELLAMY and MICHAEL D JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM C RUMER, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and JULIA SLATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellamy v. Rumer et al
as 1:2020cv02554
Plaintiff:
George Bellamy
Defendant:
Judge William C. Rumer, Superior Court of Muscogee County and Julia Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmett Williams v. Clay Land, et al
as 20-11423
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKS TRUCKING COMPANY, INC. OF MEMPHIS, AUSTIN & SPARKS, PC, MARK D. LEFKOW and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMETT WILLIAMS
Rumer v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv14094
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Paul Rumer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. LAND
as 4:2019cv00077
Defendant:
CLAY D LAND, BROOKS TRUCKING COMPANY INC OF MEMPHIS, Judge CHARLES R WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
EMMETT L WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Duscio, et al v. Al Hill, et al
as 17-13651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DUSCIO, TINA COLEMAN, THOMAS KELLY COLEMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AL B. HILL
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-12630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
