Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Runquist v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jessica Runquist
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADAMS et al v. Runquist
as 2:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ADAMS and Nikiya Bailey
Defendant:
Annalyn Runquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mitchell v. Spencer et al
as 1:2021cv01842
Defendant:
J. Spencer, D. McMichaels, Carroll Lingren and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Runquist v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv04016
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Scott C Runquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Runquist v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv04218
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Scott C Runquist
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Runquist v. Adkins et al
as 2:2016at01015
Defendant:
Scott Adkins, Inc. Medtronic and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Terry Runquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runquist v. Adkins et al
as 2:2016cv01947
Defendant:
Scott Adkins, Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Terry Runquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
