Cases 41 - 50 of 404
James Bogan-Bey v. Loretta Rush
as 22-2557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. BOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LORETTA H. RUSH
James Bogan-Bey v. Loretta Rush
as 22-2536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. BOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LORETTA H. RUSH
Rushing v. State of Illinois
as 1:2022cv03797
Petitioner:
James Levadus Rushing
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rushing v. State of Illinois
as 3:2022cv01539
Petitioner:
James Levadus Rushing
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rushing v. Aon plc
as 1:2022cv03452
Plaintiff:
Sharon Rushing
Defendant:
Aon plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Brian Hope, et al v. Commissioner of Indiana Department of Correction, et al
as 22-2150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN HOPE, GARY SNIDER, JOSEPH STANDISH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMISSIONER OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR, ALLEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Williams v. AON PLC
as 1:2022cv03397
Plaintiff:
Misty Williams, Sharon Rushing and Deanna Dube
Defendant:
AON PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
RSUI Indemnity Company v. Rush Street Gaming LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03269
Plaintiff:
RSUI Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Rush Street Gaming LLC, Rush Street Interactive LLC, Rush Street Interactive LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Winston et al v. Donathan et al
as 4:2022cv04097
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston, John Swanson, Karl Roberts and others
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, J Reid, S Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
