Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penick v. Rush et al
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Justin L Penick
Defendant:
Rush, English, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN RUSH
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and RACHELLE BROWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ali v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali, Muft Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali, Frances L Smith-Bey and others
Defendant:
K Smith, Morgan, Guajavdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Noonan et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Karan Terrell Rush
Defendant:
CO Patrick Noonan, Sgt Anderson, CO Juan Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSH v. GARDNER
as 1:2023cv02130
Petitioner:
ANTONIO L. RUSH
Respondent:
GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAINE v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
DILON BLAINE
Defendant:
DAVIS, RUSH and ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antwan Carruthers v. Elkhart County Jail, et al
as 23-2052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELKHART COUNTY JAIL, ELKHART COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, Administration, DEPUTY DANLEY and others
J. Bogan-Bey v. Loretta Rush
as 23-2075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. BOGAN-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LORETTA H. RUSH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
