Cases 1 - 10 of 63
FULLER v. SANDOVAL et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
DIANA FULLER
Defendant:
SERGIO SANDOVAL, SAN JOSE TRUCKING, INC and RUSH TRUCK LEASING, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
RUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN RUSH
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and RACHELLE BROWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSH v. GARDNER
as 1:2023cv02130
Petitioner:
ANTONIO L. RUSH
Respondent:
GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAINE v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
DILON BLAINE
Defendant:
DAVIS, RUSH and ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARKS v. WELLS et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
DEVON E. STARKS
Defendant:
J. WELLS, VIGO COUNTY SECURITY CENTER, ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSH v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
DAMON RUSH
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUSHING v. WILLIAM et al
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. RUSHING
Defendant:
PATRICIA WILLIAM, JASON CARTER, CENTURIUN MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANBLAIR v. RUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 1:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
BRANDON VANBLAIR
Defendant:
RUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., RUSH COUNTY INDIANA, INDIANA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
BOGAN-BEY v. RUSH
as 1:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
J. BOGAN-BEY
Defendant:
LORETTA H. RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSHING v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. RUSHING
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL and REGIONAL MEDICAL DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
