Cases 21 - 30 of 30
TINSLEY v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2010cv03365
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. BALICIKI et al
as 1:2009cv01905
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
KAREN BALICIKI, LINDA EVERETT, DOUGLAS WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TINSLEY v. BALICIKI et al
as 1:2009cv01740
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
KAREN BALICIKI, LINDA EVERETT, J. HEDGEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TINSLEY v. BALICKI
as 1:2009cv01370
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
KAREN BALICKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TINSLEY v. STATE OF NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv06273
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CLASSIFICATION DEPT. OFFICERS, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TINSLEY v. WARDEN THEODORE J. HATIER, JR et al
as 1:2008cv02658
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
WARDEN THEODORE J. HATIER, JR, CAPTAIN S. MURRAY and CAPTAIN JAMES P. MURPHY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Russell Tinsley v. Giorla, et al
as 08-2295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY BROCKENBROUGH, BUTLER, CUFFEE, Sergeant and others
TINSLEY v. DEL ROSSO et al
as 1:2008cv01251
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
GERALD DEL ROSSO, JON S. CORZINE, THEODORE J. HATIER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TINSLEY v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2007cv01701
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TINSLEY v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2007cv01661
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
