Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Johns v. Russell et al
as 2:2023cv00870
Petitioner:
Casey Johns
Respondent:
Perry Russell and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johns v. Russell et al
as 2:2023cv00094
Petitioner:
Casey Johns
Respondent:
Perry Russell and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Russell
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richardson
Defendant:
Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. NDOC et al
as 3:2022cv00391
Petitioner:
Terrance E. Williams
Respondent:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Russell, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Russell
as 3:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
Philip Hughes
Respondent:
Kyle Olsen and Perry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grim v. Russell et al
as 3:2022cv00322
Petitioner:
Lynn Ray Grim
Respondent:
Russell and Accounting Inquiry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. N.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2022cv00298
Petitioner:
Terrance E. Williams
Respondent:
N.D.O.C., Russel, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burns v. Russell et al
as 3:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
David Burns
Respondent:
Russell and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burns v. Warden Russell et al
as 3:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
David Burns
Respondent:
Warden Russell and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moraga v. Russell et al
as 3:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Roy Daniels Moraga
Respondent:
Perry Russell and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
