Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Diana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 21-1274
Defendant:
AC1 COMMUNICATIONS, a DirecTV Authorized Dealer, and its principal Adam Cox, MICHAEL ASGHARI, KREATAMOTIVE LLC, a DirecTV Authorized Dealer and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RUSSELL LOCKE, THOMAS STARK, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated, STEWART ABRAMSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
Vance, et al. v. DirecTV, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00179
Defendant:
AC1 Communications, Michael Asghari, IQ Marketing 2, Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey, Craig Cunningham, Stewart Abramson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Locke v. Baenan
as 2:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell Locke
Defendant:
Michael Baenan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Locke v. Pollard
as 2:2011cv00296
Petitioner:
Brian Russell Locke
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Locke v. Jennings et al
as 2:2010cv00585
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell Locke
Defendant:
Dr Jennings, Dr Smith and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. Pollard
as 2:2010cv00025
Petitioner:
Brian Russell Locke
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Locke v. Chiarkas et al
as 2:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell Locke
Defendant:
Nicholas L Chiarkas, Kellie Krake, Deborah Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke v. Lutsey et al
as 2:2009cv00850
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell Locke
Defendant:
RN Lutsey, HSU Supervisor Zwier and Dr Heidorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke v. United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2008cv00678
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell Locke
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin and Clerk of Court for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
