Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2054cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Farris E. Mallo
Respondent:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aron Freeland v. William Marshall
as 23-7085
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARON J. FREELAND
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM K. MARSHALL, Acting Commissioner and MR. RUSSELL MASTON
Miller v. Marshall et al
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Miller
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Medina Prue, Leslie Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Maston et al
as 2:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Bennie Ray Roberts
Respondent:
Russell Maston, Brad Douglas, W. J. Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Carroll v. Russell Maston
as 22-6778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON GLENN CARROLL
Defendant / Appellee:
RUSSELL MASTON, Superintendent St. Mary's Correctional Center and Jail, KAREN TOWNSON and BETSEY JIVIDEN
Carroll v. Maston et al
as 3:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jason Glenn Carroll
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Karen Townson and Betsey Jividen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballenger v. Maston et al
as 3:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
William Julius Ballenger
Defendant:
William Julius Maston, Russell Maston, Shawn Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
