Cases 1 - 10 of 67
VARGAS v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
JUAN MONTES VARGAS
Defendant:
DR HARRIS and Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lawson
as 2:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Respondent:
Russell Washburn and Ronnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. CORECIVIC INC et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
HARRINGTON CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CORECIVIC INC, Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN, NANCY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUDHANI v. WASHBURN
as 4:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
MAHEMOOD BUDHANI
Defendant:
Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prudent v. WASHBURN et al
as 5:2022cv00231
Petitioner:
ENSI PRUDENT
Respondent:
Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN, Act. Dir. ICE Atl. SEAN IRVIN, Director, ICE TAE D JOHNSON and others
Marcus Polk v. Tony Parker, et al
as 22-5506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS D. POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, TDOC Commissioner, in his individual capacity, RUBENARD RISPER, Chief of Security at Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex, in his individual and official capacity, YOLANDA PITTMAN, Associate Warden, in her individual and official capacity and others
Jatta v. Washburn
as 1:2022cv01041
Petitioner:
Kekuta Jatta
Respondent:
Russell Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Naghman v. Washburn
as 1:2021cv03353
Petitioner:
Rafiq Naghman
Respondent:
Warden Russell Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alexander v. Washburn
as 1:2021cv03302
Petitioner:
Dominic J. Alexander
Respondent:
Warden Russell Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GIRON-VILLATORO v. WASHBURN
as 4:2020cv00294
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Petitioner:
EDWIN ROBERTO GIRON-VILLATORO
Respondent:
Warden D GREENWALT and Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
