Cases 1 - 10 of 11
George v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Celestine George
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Jefferson Dunn and Ruth Naglich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hampton v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00385
Defendant:
Ruth Naglich, Alabama Department of Corrections and Jefferson Dunn
Plaintiff:
Maya Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaty v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Greg Lovelace, Markeon Person, Deon Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adam Beaty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Head et al v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00132
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, LLC, Jimmy Patrick, Leon Bollings and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Rust, Jeri Ford, Betty Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dunn et al
as 2:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, LaToya Strum, State of Alabama, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shook v. Dunn et al
as 2:2018cv01048
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, Jefferson Dunn, Corizon Correctional Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Annalisa Shook and Lisa Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Corizon LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00972
Defendant:
Charles Hooper, Alabama Department of Corrections, Dewayne Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Shelena Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Emma D. Cook and Natalie C. McKenzie
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC , Alabama Department of Corrections , Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
Theresa Holley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , Kilby Correctional Facility , Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
