Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Shields v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv02074
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuck Shields
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Carl Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sykes v. Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv04102
Plaintiff:
Susan Sykes
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc and Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ragar Transportation v. Lear Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
Ragar Transportation
Defendant:
Lear Corporation , Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc and Penske Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tabullo et al v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00993
Defendant:
Harold Waford Burns and Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Tabullo and Rafael Tabullo
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Evans et al v. AT & T, Corp. et al
as 5:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
John C. Evans and Debra G. Evans
Defendant:
AT & T, Corp. , AT & T, Inc., Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements v. Knight et al
as 6:2014cv02498
Plaintiff:
Brett J Clements
Defendant:
Steven R Knight , Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc and Old Republic Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc
as 4:2014mc01274
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D Brooks
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc
Orso v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00305
Plaintiff:
John Orso, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Oscar Spears, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logitraq, LLC v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Logitraq, LLC
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
