Cases 1 - 10 of 46
MILLER v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH S. MILLER
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATERMAN v. MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, KIERAN CONWAY, DANIEL D CRONHEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Miller v. Mason et al
as 1:2021cv01526
Petitioner:
Joshua S. Miller
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason, Pennsylvania State Parole Board Supervisor and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARRON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00564
Defendant:
L. Cronaver, John E. Wetzel, K. Ransom and others
Plaintiff:
Emery Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv01343
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
Alyssa S Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Mason et al
as 1:2021cv00393
Petitioner:
Joshua S. Miller
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Bernadette Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARRON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00530
Defendant:
L. CRONAVER, JOHN E. WETZEL, K. RANSOM and others
Plaintiff:
EMERY BARRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARNER et al v. SWEPI, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. ZINK, JOHN L. STEWART, GILDA GIANCOLA and others
Defendant:
SWEPI, LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2019cv01172
Plaintiff:
SUSAN S. MILLER
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McLaughlin v. Zavada et al
as 1:2019cv00474
Defendant:
Angela Zimmerlink, Lt. Smith, Lt. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
William McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
