Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
DeBenedetti Investment Associates v. Circraft Incorporated et al
as 3:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
DeBenedetti Investment Associates
Defendant:
Circraft Incorporated, Estate of Lee Adams, Deceased, Estate of Anne S. Adams, Deceased and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
(PS) Singh v. City of Placerville et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Raj Singh and Raghvendra Singh
Defendant:
City of Placerville, Samuel Emerson and Mark S. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cohen et al v. County of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2021cv09489
Plaintiff:
David Cohen, Shalom Bayit Inc. and Azuza Refuge Foundation Inc.
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, Andrew F. Adams, Mark S. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kip Grant v. Eric S. Adams Jr.
as 5:2020cv01981
Plaintiff:
Kip Grant
Defendant:
Eric S. Adams Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baptiste v. Hatton et al
as 4:2019cv06551
Defendant:
J. Truett, J. Hatton, M. DeAntoni and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Baptiste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack R. Finnegan v. Jeffery Clark et al
as 8:2018cv00330
Defendant:
Mark S. Adams, California Receivership Group PBC, Jeffery A. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Finnegan
Jack R. Finnegan v. City of Dana Point et al
as 8:2017cv00976
Defendant:
Mark S. Adams, California Receivership Group PBC, City of Dana Point and others
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Finnegan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
