Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz v. B. Valdez, et al
as 19-15881
Defendant / Appellee:
S. SAVOIE, S. ESCOBAR, GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO
(PC) Cruz v. Valdez et al
as 1:2018cv01723
Defendant:
S. Escobar, R. Gonzalez, I. Maldonado and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Escobar
as 1:2016cv01770
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
S. Escobar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. Michael A Escobar et al
as 5:2015cv02148
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Defendant:
Does, Allyson Rae Escobar, Lorna S Escobar and others
Castillo et al v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2011cv04751
Plaintiff:
Jobel Arevalo Castillo, Jose S. Escobar and Carlos Mancia
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, County of Suffolk Police Department, Police Officers John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Michael Rochester v. Linda Rowe, et al
as 10-17772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAWN ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA ROWE, MD, CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Dr., MICHAEL C. SAYRE and others
United States of America v. 4300-4302 E 3rd Street, Los Angeles, California et al
as 2:2007cv05492
Defendant:
2617 E Cesar Chavez Ave, 3026 Frazier St., Baldwin Park, California, 4300-4302 E 3rd Street and others
Claimant:
City of Baldwin Park, Jose Escobar, Sr., Linda U S Escobar and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Rochester v. Rowe et al
as 5:2008cv04747
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Rochester
Defendant:
Linda Rowe, Claire Williams, Michael C. Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
