Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Harris v. The City of New York
as 24-1004
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL C. HARRIS, YUSUF A. HARRIS, GREGORY S. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDREW DIETZ, New York City Police Department Detective and others
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00697
Petitioner:
BRENDA A. PATTERSON
Respondent:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, KRISTEN M. CLARKE and ANGELA D. CAESAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States v. Harris
as 21-2102
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. HARRIS
Randolph Harris v. Warden Quay
as 21-7038
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDOLPH S. HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN HERMAN QUAY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Darrell Goss v. Scott Harris
as 21-6867
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, U.S. Supreme Court Clerk
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL L. GOSS
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Scott Harris, et al
as 21-5102
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Ames, Clerk in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Peter R. Marksteiner, Clerk in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Jeffrey Atkins, Clerk in the United States Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Jason Harris v. Montoya, et al
as 21-15622
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTOYA, Unknown; CO II, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of the US Supreme Court and CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, Jr., Clerk of the US Supreme Court
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Helen Le v. USPS, et al
as 21-15533
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CEO, Director, Supervisor and SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk at Supreme Court of US
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELEN LE
Dontez Simuel v. Scott Harris
as 21-6097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court and LAURIE WOOD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
