Cases 41 - 50 of 238
WHITFIELD v. CMC MATERIALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
CMC MATERIALS, INC., WILLIAM P NOGLOWS, DAVID H LI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Finger v. CMC Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
CMC Materials, Inc., Richard S. Hill, Barbara A. Klein and others
David Hill v. Riverside County
as 5:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
David Hill and David S. Hill
Defendant:
Riverside County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill et al v. Philips RS North America LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Hill and Charles A. Hill
Defendant:
Philips RS North America LLC, Philips North America LLC and Philips Holding USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ciccotelli v. CMC Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
CMC Materials, Inc., William P. Noglows, David H. Li and others
ISRAEL v. FOSKEY et al
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
CONNIE RAY ISRAEL
Defendant:
D FOSKEY, RODGER, G CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stein v. CMC Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
CMC Materials, Inc., William P. Noglows, David H. Li and others
ISRAEL v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
CONNIE RAY ISRAEL
Defendant:
D FOSKEY, RODGER, G CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canela Cifuentes Catalan v. James S. Hill et al
as 5:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Canela Cifuentes Catalon
Defendant:
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA acting by and through THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; a California Public Entity, Warden James S Hill, DOE OFFICER 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner v. Brown et al
as 4:2021cv04102
Plaintiff:
Jason Christian Warner
Defendant:
Porscha Brown, S. Hill and Hilary Unger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
