Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WARRIORS AND FAMILY ASSISTANCE CENTER LLC et al v. TRAJECTOR INC et al
as 1:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
WARRIORS AND FAMILY ASSISTANCE CENTER LLC, TONYA PRICE, MANRING & FARRELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW and others
Defendant:
TRAJECTOR INC, VET COMP & PEN MEDICAL CONSULTING LLC, JAMES S HILL, II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ISRAEL v. FOSKEY et al
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
CONNIE RAY ISRAEL
Defendant:
D FOSKEY, RODGER, G CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISRAEL v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
CONNIE RAY ISRAEL
Defendant:
D FOSKEY, RODGER, G CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv14287
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Andre S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jennifer S. Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Provident Bank v. Hill
as 8:2012cv01663
Plaintiff:
Provident Bank
Defendant:
John S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31301
Hill v. Lee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie S Hill
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff's Office, Jack Long, Barbara Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State Officials
as 2:2009cv00758
Petitioner:
Eddie S Hill
Respondent:
State Officials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
