Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Paul Lawson v. William Stephens, et al
as 18-10877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL EUGENE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, TDCJ-CID, UNKNOWN, Custodian of Offender Records, VICKIE BARROWS, Director of Access to Courts and others
Joe v. Richardson et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
Warden Kendall T Richardson, Jennifer S Brown, Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn v. Expansion Cell Block et al
as 7:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant:
Expansion Cell Block, Larry D Goatley, Jr., David E Petges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Linthicum et al
as 7:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Darrold L Alexander and Marcus S Rhodes
Defendant:
Phyllis McWhorter, Tommy L. Norwood, Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Murray et al
as 7:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Moses, Sr
Defendant:
Leonard S Murray, Lisa S James, Robert B Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Avery et al
as 5:2013ct03309
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Williams
Defendant:
Sergeant Avery and S. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horace v. Blevins et al
as 7:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lynell Horace
Defendant:
Dolores Thornton and Lisa S James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. James et al
as 7:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Danny Duffy
Defendant:
Lisa S James, Eddie C. Williams, Angela N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernando Guizar v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 12-15001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO GUIZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, E. ALAMEIDA, Jr., G. HARRIS and others
Jackson v. Williams et al
as 7:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Dewon Jackson
Defendant:
E C Williams, Clyde L Hargrove, Jimmy S Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
