Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2021cv00913
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, C. SHEETS, S. JARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Lewis
Defendant:
Archie L. Smith, III, Kelly S. King , Jeff D. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SMITH et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff:
BREWSTER SMITH, JR , DORIS KIROUAC , CHRISTINA HAWKS and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION , BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE , BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PNC Bank, National Association v. At-Net Holding, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00324
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
At-Net Holding, LLC , At-Net Services-Charlotte, Inc. , At-Net Services-Greenville, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Webster et al v. Ameritas Investment Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
Patricia B. Webster and William L. Thorp Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Ameritas Investment Corporation , Unifi Mutual Holding Company , Ameritas Holding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Moorish Science Temple of America et al v. State of North Carolina, Cumberland County et al
as 5:2010mc00067
Plaintiff:
Moorish Science Temple of America, Moorish American National Republic, G. Taliba El Bey and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Cumberland County, E. Lynn Johnson, Gregory A. Weeks and others
King v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00536
Plaintiff:
Egbert S. King
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BORCHARDT v. KING, et al
as 1:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BORCHARDT
Defendant:
KELLY S. KING, CHRISTOPHER L HENSON, DARYL N. BIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
