Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Young S. Lee v. Antonio Miranda et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Young S. Lee
Defendant:
Antonio Miranda, Juan Garica and Does 1 to 10
Young S. Lee v. Adan Gutierrez et al
as 2:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Young S. Lee
Defendant:
Adan Gutierrez and Does 1 to 10
Young S. Lee v. Adan Gutierrez et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Young S. Lee
Defendant:
Adan Gutierrez, Lisa Alcantar and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Young S. Lee v. Adan Gutierrez et al
as 2:2023cv10568
Plaintiff:
Young S. Lee
Defendant:
Adan Gutierrez, Does 1 to 10 and Alex Parra
Melody J. Rodgers v. Judge Sun et al.
as 2:2022cv02418
Petitioner:
Melody J. Rodgers
Respondent:
Judge Sun, Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services, Joseph S. Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Judy G Rodgers, Lucille D Gay, Melony Rodgers and others
Defendant:
State of California, Los Angeles County and Kernell Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AKF, Inc. v. US Chambada, Inc. et al
as 2:2022mc00055
Plaintiff:
AKF, Inc. dba Fundkite and AKF, Inc. doing business as Fundkite
Defendant:
US Chambada, Inc. dba Sushi by Chambada, Hee S. Lee and US Chambada, Inc. doing business as Sushi by Chambada
Foster v. Crosby et al
as 3:2022cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Barkarri Foster
Defendant:
C. Crosby, J. Puente, C. Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Song Pae v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
as 2:2021cv08898
Plaintiff:
SONG WON PAE, Sang Ok Pae, MEESON PAE YANG and others
Defendant:
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a subsidiary of BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Bank of New York Mellon, Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
