Cases 1 - 10 of 30
NICHOLS v. E. JUDDUE et al
as 2:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
RONELL NICHOLS
Defendant:
E. JUDDUE, O. DWOMOH, S. DAVIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2021cv02600
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, D.F. OBERLANDER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
LATIEF S. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2020cv19472
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19472
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. YOUNG and THE ESTATE OF CAROL L. YOUNG
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv07716
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
TINA S. YOUNG
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lazarus v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00843
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Lazarus
Defendant:
Stephen R. Biggar, Todd S. Young, Edmund P. Harrigan and others
Nominal Defendant:
Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv18451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Terry Hager v. S. Young
as 19-3154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY HAGER
Defendant / Appellee:
S. YOUNG, Warden
HAGER v. YOUNG
as 1:2019cv12835
Defendant:
S. YOUNG
Plaintiff:
TERRY HAGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAVAREZ v. YOUNG
as 1:2019cv07477
Respondent:
WARDEN S. YOUNG
Petitioner:
FELIX TAVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
