Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Davis v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lamont Davis
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, S Young, Pribble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dabdoub v. Triduum Financial Services LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01859
Plaintiff:
David R Dabdoub
Defendant:
Triduum Financial Services LLC, Michael S Young, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02249
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Arlene S Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Crane Brothers, LLC v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Idaho et al
as 1:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
Crane Brothers, LLC,
Defendant:
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Idaho , Shawn S. Young , Loren D West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Terra Young v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
as 13-16133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRA S. YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC.
Terra Young v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
as 13-15319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRA S. YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC.
Terra Young v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
as 12-16322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRA S. YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC.
Young v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
Terra S. Young
Defendant:
North American Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cedano v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00237
Plaintiff:
Ralph Cedano, Donna Garcia and Sandra Zirkel
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Thrifty Payless, Inc.
206) 233-7107 (fax:
Mary S. Young and Mary S. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
v. Diamond Parking Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00149
Movant:
Eric Schroeder
Respondent:
Diamond Parking Inc. , Diamond Parking Services, LLC , Stephen J. Kozlowski and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
