Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Garza, Miguel v. S.C. Swiderski Construction, LLC
as 3:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Miguel Garza
Defendant:
S.C. Swiderski Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Tesky, Kal v. Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Kal Tesky
Defendant:
Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Tesky, Keith v. Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
as 3:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Keith Tesky
Defendant:
Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ollerman, Kenneth v. Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ollerman
Defendant:
Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tessmer, Mark v. Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Mark Tessmer
Defendant:
Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sonsalla, Ronald v. Hawks Quindel, S.C. et al
as 3:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Ronald John Sonsalla
Defendant:
Hawks Quindel, S.C., Attorney Nicholas Fairweather and H.R. Sara Dahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Nicolet Law Office S.C. v. Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. et al
as 3:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Nicolet Law Office S.C.
Defendant:
Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. and Saint Paul Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hupy & Abraham SC v. Quintessa LLC
as 2:2021cv00577
Plaintiff:
Hupy & Abraham, S.C. and Hupy & Abraham SC
Defendant:
Quintessa LLC d/b/a Quintessa Marketing and Quintessa LLC doing business as Quintessa Marketing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
