Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BRAYBOY v. S.C.I. MAHANOY et al
as 2:2023cv02475
Petitioner:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Respondent:
S.C.I. MAHANOY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forrest v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2017cv01777
Plaintiff:
Michael Forrest
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Theresa Delbalso, B. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv05084
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WILLIAM ELLIS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, STANZIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPARKS v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2014cv06161
Petitioner:
DAVID L. SPARKS
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, S.C.I. MAHANOY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUNDY v. CITY OF PHILA COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv05045
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MUNDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITY and S.C.I. - MAHANOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEASON v. S.C.I. MAHANOY
as 1:2013cv00247
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BEASON
Defendant:
S.C.I. MAHANOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edward Goodman v. John Kerestes, et al
as 11-1613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KERESTES, Superintendent, S.C.I. Mahanoy, PA BD PROBATION AND PAROLE and ATTY GEN PA
Ayers v. S.C.I. Mahanoy et al
as 3:2010cv02422
Petitioner:
William Ayers
Respondent:
S.C.I. Mahanoy, Lackawanna County DA's Office and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Angel Pabon v. Superintendent SCI Mahanoy, et al
as 08-1536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL PABON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA, DA PHILADELPHIA and JOHN KERESTES, SUPERINTENDENT, S.C.I., MAHANOY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
