Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 862
Dai et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02537
Plaintiff: Hanson Dai, Max Chiswick, Adolph Robles and others
Defendant: SAS Institute Inc., Ideas Inc., Choice Hotels International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nystrom v. Khana Marine LTD., et al.
as 24-2553
Plaintiff: ELIAS NYSTROM
Defendant: KHANA MARINE LTD. and NOK CO. LTD. SA, in personam
Houston Casualty Co. et al v. Ambitious Line SA et al
as 3:2024cv02292
Plaintiff: Houston Casualty Co. and Green Diamond Resource Company
Defendant: Ambitious Line SA, Shikishima Kisen KK and M/V Grove Island
Tribal Streetwear, Inc. v. Givenchy Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00661
Plaintiff: Tribal Streetwear, Inc.
Defendant: Givenchy Corporation and Givenchy SA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement (jurisdiction)
Y.Y.G.M. SA d.b.a. Brandy Melville v. Redbubble, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01952
Plaintiff: Y.Y.G.M. SA d.b.a. Brandy Melville
Defendant: Redbubble, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Malta De Sa v. Garland
as 24-1902
Petitioner: MATHEUS MALTA DE SA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Saed
as 24-1923
Defendant: DIEGO SAED and Diego Maradona Haval Saed
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Compton Cowboys, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02642
Plaintiff: Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant: Compton Cowboys, Inc., Israel Houghton, Jekalyn Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VIP Products LLC v. Champagne Louis Roederer SA
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff: VIP Products LLC
Defendant: Champagne Louis Roederer SA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Microids, SA v. Maximum Games, LLC
as 4:2024cv01362
Plaintiff: Microids, SA
Defendant: Maximum Games, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?