Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC et al v. VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPERESS SOMERDALE LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04376
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DUNKIN' BRANDS, INC. and others
Defendant:
VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPERESS SOMERDALE LLC, VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS TURNERSVILLE LLC, VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SEWELL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHINGS LLC et al v. VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SOMERDALE LLC et al
as 1:2021cv17719
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHINGS LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC and DD IP HOLDER LLC
Defendant:
VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SOMERDALE LLC, VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS TURNERSVILLE LLC, VICKY AND CONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SEWELL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Didier Hossain v. Sanraj, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03270
Defendant:
John Doe, Sailesh Patel, Sanraj, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
SK MD Didier Hossain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chokshi v. Flo-Tek Florida, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv11621
Defendant:
Flo-Tek Florida, LLC, Joshua Bishop and Sailesh Patel
Plaintiff:
Mrugesh Chokshi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez et al v. Sanraj, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03386
Plaintiff:
Sandra Diaz-Soto and Janice Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sailesh Patel and Sanraj, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
DAYS INN WORLDWIDE, INC. v. PATEL et al
as 2:2012cv01497
Plaintiff:
DAYS INN WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
SAILESH PATEL, PRAFUL PATEL, BHARAT PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
San Joaquin Motel and Hotel Pr, et al v. City of Stockton, et al
as 10-15235
Plaintiff:
SAN JOAQUIN MOTEL AND HOTEL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ARVIN PATEL, JAWAID AKHTAR and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAIR AFZL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, GARY PODESTO, STEVE PINKERTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
