Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00275
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salcedo v. Bisignano
as 0:2026cv62604
Plaintiff:
Jorge David Salcedo
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03471
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(SS) Aceves v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv07236
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Salcedo Aceves
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cherney et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01081
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cherney, Janice Feagins, Brian Fernalld and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01619
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02928
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zabala Rodriguez v. Salcedo
as 26-50682
Plaintiff:
Manuel Lazaro Zabala Rodriguez
Defendant:
Danay Conde Salcedo
Proctor v. Parris Towers et al
as 4:2026cv00842
Plaintiff:
Terrance Proctor
Defendant:
Parris Towers, Security Solutions of Little Rock, Wendell Piggie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
