Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Humane Society of the US, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 15-5041
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Michigan United Conservation Clubs, Michigan Hunting Dog Federation and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire, State of North Dakota, State of Colorado and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, State of Michigan, State of Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Born Free USA, Help Our Wolves Live, Humane Society of the United States and others
Humane Society of the United, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 15-5060
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire, State of North Dakota, State of Colorado and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, State of Michigan, National Rifle Association of America and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and State of Wisconsin
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Help Our Wolves Live, Born Free USA, Humane Society of the United States and others
Humane Society of the United, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 15-5061
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
State of Michigan and Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire, State of North Dakota, State of Colorado and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
National Rifle Association of America, U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Michigan Hunting Dog Federation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Help Our Wolves Live, Born Free USA, Humane Society of the United States and others
Our Children's Earth Foundatio, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 17-16214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OUR CHILDREN'S EARTH FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation and ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, PENNY PRITZKER, in official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, RODNEY MCINNES, in official capacity as Regional Administrator, NMFS Southwest Region and others
Our Children's Earth Foundatio, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 17-16213
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OUR CHILDREN'S EARTH FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation and ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, PENNY PRITZKER, in official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, RODNEY MCINNES, in official capacity as Regional Administrator, NMFS Southwest Region and others
Mohn v. Jewell, et al
as 17-5002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AYINDE MOHN
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Interior, MIKE CONNER, Assistant Secretary of the Interior - Indian Affairs and JACOB J. LEW, Secretary of the Treasury
Chissoe v. Jewell
as 16-5172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL CHISSOE
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America
Peter Atherton v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-5247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter James Atherton
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, Secretary, Department of Interior, Individual and Official Capacity, Robert Maclean, United States Park Police, Police Chief, Veranelli, Sergeant and others
Permian Basin Petroleum Assn, et al v. DOI, et al
as 16-50453
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION, CHAVES COUNTY, NEW MEXICO, ROOSEVELT COUNTY, NEW MEXICO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Interior and others
sally jewell, secretary of the interior
as 2:2015cv09461
Movant:
sally jewell, secretary of the interior
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
