Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Casey v. Bare et al
as 5:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Casey
Defendant:
Corporal Hannah Bare, Corporal Pack, Officer Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson et al v. Waller et al
as 2:2021cv00433
Plaintiff:
Latasha Nelson, Andrew Miller and Fontain Nelson
Defendant:
Waller, Waggy, Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damron v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jonathan T. Damron, Randy Howerton, Brandon Michel Lane and others
Defendant:
Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center, Sgt. Cox, Corp. Sturgil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Hanes, Corp. Pack and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michel Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howerton v. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Pack, Corp. Sampson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Howerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Hanes, Corp. Pack and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Michel Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampson v. Tri-State Emergency Physicians, LLP et al
as 5:2020cv00255
Defendant:
Tri-State Emergency Physicians, LLP and United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shari Sampson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Sampson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10367
Plaintiff:
Lisa K. Sampson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sampson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02205
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Sampson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sampson v. Indiana Michigan Power Company - River Transportation Division et al
as 3:2015cv16571
Plaintiff:
Charles Sampson
Defendant:
AEP River Operations, LLC and Indiana Michigan Power Company - River Transportation Division
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
