Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Schatz et al v. Meta Platforms Inc
as 2:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Schatz, Mary Pickens, Elizabeth Rosas and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Richardson v. Lall et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Raymond Remell Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge J. Jessy Lall, Sergeant Francious, M.P. Officer Strout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02599
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STANDFORD SAMUEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv10024
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01498
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94682
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05496
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIchael Johnson v. Calhoun SP Warden
as 17-11805
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SAMUEL JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CALHOUN SP WARDEN
Johnson v. Intense Movers, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00835
Plaintiff:
Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Intense Movers, Inc. and Alexander Leute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Hall
as 1:2015cv00097
Petitioner:
Michael Samuel Johnson
Respondent:
Phillip Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
