Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BYERS et al v. FINISHING SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02110
Defendant:
Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Jim Dorton Contracting, Graco Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cody King, Samuel L. Smith, Savannah D. Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BYERS et al v. FINISHING SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 5:2020cv03207
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA L. BARNES, CODY KING, SAMUEL L. SMITH and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, ABC CORPORATIONS (A-Z), FINISHING SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Samuel Smith v. Progressive Insurance Company
as 17-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL L. SMITH and SARAH A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM LIFE GROUP, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
SMITH et al v. BEATY INVESTMENTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93459
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. SMITH and CAROLINA SMITH
Defendant:
BEATY INVESTMENTS, INC., GRINNELL CORPORATION, AQUA-CHEM INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KIRBY et al v. BEATY INVESTMENTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93441
Plaintiff:
BONNIE H. KIRBY, BONNIE H. KIRBY, BONNIE H. KIRBY and others
Defendant:
BEATY INVESTMENTS, INC., GRINNELL CORPORATION, AQUA-CHEM INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH et al v. AURORA PUMP et al
as 2:2008cv70890
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. SMITH and BARBARA SMITH
Defendant:
AURORA PUMP, CBS CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Samuel L. Smith, et al. v. Aurora Pump, et al.
as NCW/1:08-CV-00012
Defendant:
Aurora Pump
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Smith
Smith et al v. Aurora Pump et al
as 1:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Smith and Barbara Smith
Defendant:
Aurora Pump, CBS Corporation, CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
