Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Samuel Whatley, II v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 24-1610
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INCORPORATED
Samuel Whatley, II v. Southern Seasons Heating & Air Conditioning
as 24-1606
Plaintiff:
PACITA D. WHATLEY, SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II and REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY
Defendant:
CLAUDE MCALHANY, Owner, NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and SOUTHERN SEASONS HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING
Samuel Whatley, II v. Charleston County Board of Elections
as 24-1596
Defendant:
CHARLESTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SOUTH CAROLINA ETHICS COMMISSION and SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTION COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Samuel Whatley, II v. City of North Charleston
as 24-1559
Plaintiff:
REV. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II and PACITA D. WHATLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON, NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAYOR KEITH SUMMEY, Mayor at CND and others
Samuel Whatley, II v. Bethany Phillips
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY and SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant:
BETHANY PHILLIPS, General Manager, U-HAUL, AMERCO and others
Samuel Whatley v. Medical University of South Carolina
as 24-1373
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY and SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant:
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Pacita Whatley v. Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
PACITA D. WHATLEY, REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY and SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant:
OAKBROOK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Samuel Whatley, II v. Waffle House, Inc.
as 23-1998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant / Appellee:
WAFFLE HOUSE, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
