Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Mark Bramlett v. Metro Narcotics Task Force, et al
as 10-11678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY BRAMLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
METRO NARCOTICS TASK FORCE, JONATHAN MEMMO, Metro Narcotic Task Force Agent, in his individual and official capacity,, JAMES PRICE, Metro Narcotic Task Force Agent, in his individual and official capacity, and others
Bellows v. Zickefoose
as 3:2009cv01838
Petitioner:
Sarah Lee Bellows
Respondent:
Donna Zickefoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bramlett v. Metro Narcotics Task Force et al
as 4:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Bramlett
Defendant:
Metro Narcotics Task Force, Jonathan Memmo, James Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bramlett v. Memmo et al
as 4:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Bramlett
Defendant:
Jonathan Memmo, James Price, Sarah Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keen v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01026
Plaintiff:
Cheri Keen and Cheri Keen
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Option One Mortgage Corporation, AHMSI Default Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LOVE et al v. CRANE CO et al
as 2:2009cv63307
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LOVE, WILLIAM LOVE, WILLIAM LOVE and others
Defendant:
CRANE CO, GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC., 3M COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SIGMON v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75582
Plaintiff:
SARAH LEE SIGMON
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAVIS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60205
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. DAVIS and SARAH LEE H. DAVIS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
