Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Staples, Bey v. Parsons et al
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Parsons, Sargent Kevin Allen, W. M. Tanzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sargent Electric Company v. Bechtel Infrastructure and Power Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Counter Defendant:
Sargent Electric Company
Defendant:
Bechtel Infrastructure and Power Corporation and Reed & Reed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sargent v. Bish et al
as 1:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Melvin Sargent
Defendant:
Joshua Bish, Amanda Moore, Logan Addair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Justin Adkins , Edwin Glowacki , Kevin Palmer and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., CSX Corporation, Craig S. Heligman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Sargent et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv04586
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Sargent and Michael Sargent
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sargent v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12606
Plaintiff:
Amanda Sargent
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sargent v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10919
Plaintiff:
Linda Sargent
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sargent v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06920
Plaintiff:
Beverly Sargent
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sargent et alv. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv15995
Plaintiff:
Joyce Sargent and Michael M. Sargent
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sargent et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09376
Plaintiff:
Petra Sargent and Lloyd Sargent
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
