Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Pollick v. Haar et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. Pollick
Defendant:
Matthew M. Haar and Saul Ewing LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Laurel Gardens LLC, et al v. Timothy McKenna, et al
as 23-2649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAUREL GARDENS LLC, AMERICAN WINTER SERVICES LLC, LAUREL GARDENS HOLDINGS LLC and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MCKENNA, MAT SITE MANAGEMENT LLC, EAISE DESIGN & LANDSCAPING LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MCKENNA, BOBBY AERENSON, GREGORY PETTINARO and others
Livia Scotto v. Saul Ewing, et al
as 22-3436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant:
SAUL EWING, ARNSTEIN AND LEHR, ATTORNEY GREVIENCE COMMITTEE SUPREME COURT, ET AL and others
Livia Scotto v. Saul Ewing, et al
as 22-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
SAUL EWING, ARNSTEIN AND LEHR, ATTORNEY GREVIENCE COMMITTEE SUPREME COURT, et al and others
Livia Scotto v. Maimonides, et al
as 22-3136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
MAIMONIDES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SAUL EWING and others
SCOTTO v. MAIMONIDES et al
as 2:2022cv03626
Plaintiff:
LIVIA SCOTTO
Defendant:
MAIMONIDES, UNITED STATES, SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN LEHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mumma v. Morgan et al
as 1:2020cv00458
Defendant:
OldCastle, George Hadley, Ronald Katzman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Mumma, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Kunj Associates, LP et al v. Wolin & Rosen Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv08213
Defendant:
Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Burke & White, Julie Kaminski and others
Plaintiff:
Kunj Associates, LP and Kiran Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
