Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cook v. Cohen et al
as 0:2022cv01515
Plaintiff:
Darry T. Cook and Darryl T. Cook
Defendant:
Levern Cohen, Consonya Washington and SCDC Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wakefield v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2020cv01161
Plaintiff:
Antonio T Wakefield
Defendant:
Major James Parrish, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Captain T Vela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Enloe et al
as 0:2019cv01953
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr., Chubb Rock, Chubb and others
Defendant:
LLD B. Jacobs, Nurse Lindsey Harris, Unknown SCDC Medical Administrator at SCDC Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Tucker et al
as 9:2014cv03628
Plaintiff:
Jarode JL Witherspoon
Defendant:
BJ Tucker, Jack Ervin, Mr Jet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving Twitty v. SCDC
as 11-7430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVING E. TWITTY
Defendant - Appellee:
SCDC, Classification Representative's Headquarters Dept., JAMES BRENNAN, Director of Classification-Records, LINDA B. DEAN, Institution Classification Case Manager and others
William McKinnedy, III v. Cecil Reynold
as 10-6456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLAYTON MCKINNEDY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CECIL REYNOLDS, Warden at Kershaw Correctional Institution and et al., ROBERT E. WARD, a/k/a Bob Ward, JON OZMINT and others
Cabbagestalk v. Richstad et al
as 3:2009cv01834
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
Kenneth A Richstad, Kathrine Hudgins, SCDC Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
William McKinnedy, III v. Cecil Reynolds
as 08-8499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLAYTON MCKINNEDY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CECIL REYNOLDS, Warden at Kershaw Correctional Institution, ROBERT WARD, a/k/a Bob Ward, JON OZMINT and others
Defendant:
MIKE FAIR, JOHN D. MCLEOD, MARVIN F. KITTRELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
