Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Demetrius Staples, et al v. Paragon Systems, Incorporated, et al
as 14-3608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS STAPLES, BABATUNDE OWOSENI and ANDREW DILLON
Defendant - Appellee:
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, doing business as PARASYS, INC., SECURITY CONSULTANTS GROUP, INCORPORATED, doing business as SCG, SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED, doing business as SECURITAS and others
Shulman et al v. Czerska
as 2:2013cv12203
Plaintiff:
Marc Shulman , Sanford Passer , Stem Cell Growth, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barbara Czerska
Compton Unified School District v. SCG Capital Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv01932
Plaintiff:
Compton Unified School District
Defendant:
Does and SCG Capital Corporation
SCG Capital Corporation v. Compton Unified School District
as 1:2013cv00798
Plaintiff:
SCG Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Compton Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Arthur Anderson v. California State Prison et al
as 2:2012cv07288
Defendant:
Ad-Scg ASU Housing Facility, Bowen, California State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anderson
Servisair LLC v. SCG Travel, Inc.
as 2:2012cv03994
Defendant:
SCG Travel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Servisair LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SCG Power Rangers v. Kandpal
as 3:2012cv03765
Plaintiff:
SCG Power Rangers
Defendant:
Kunal Kandpal
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Pharmacy Corporation of America v. SCG Baywood, LLC
as 8:2012cv00620
Plaintiff:
Pharmacy Corporation of America
Defendant:
SCG Baywood, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCG Power Rangers LLC v. Michael Alen et al
as 2:2012cv02087
Defendant:
Michael Alen and Does
Plaintiff:
SCG Power Rangers LLC
Craig Sanford v. SCG International, LLC
as 11-2394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CRAIG SANFORD and MARY JO SANFORD
Defendant - Appellant:
SCG INTERNATIONAL, LLC and JAMES F. SMITH, JR., a/k/a Jamie Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
