Cases 11 - 20 of 6,064
Cawthon v. Manh
as 1:2024cv03506
Plaintiff:
Scott Cawthon
Defendant:
Dinh Duc Manh
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Geary v. Oliviero et al
as 1:2024cv03471
Plaintiff:
Kevin Geary
Defendant:
James F. Oliviero, III, William Garrett Gray, Christian Bchon and others
Cawthon v. CONG TY TNHH THUONG MAI CANBEONE
as 1:2024cv03413
Plaintiff:
Scott Cawthon
Defendant:
CONG TY TNHH THUONG MAI CANBEONE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bien-Aime v. Scott et al
as 1:2024cv03264
Plaintiff:
Elijah Bien-Aime
Defendant:
FBOP Staff Co Mr. B. Scott, Mr. Ma'at and Unit G-43 Lieutenant (Unknown)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferrara et al v. United Auto Supply of Syracuse, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ferrara, Scott Johnson and Michael Trinca
Defendant:
United Auto Supply of Syracuse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chappel v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Todd Chappel
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
City of New York v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 7:2024cv03345
Plaintiff:
City of New York
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
