Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Simmons et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al--PER #18 ORDER STATUS REPORT DUE EVERY 60 DAYS
as 6:2021cv02036
Defendant:
David Scott, Bret Tapken, Ramiz Mujelic and others
Plaintiff:
Levita Simmons, Jeffrey Orvis, Estate of Arthur Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cano et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cano, Peter Junior Cano, Jennifer Cano and others
Defendant:
Amanda Brown, Stephen R. Stouffer, Samuel Dean Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv02021
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Stephen et al
as 3:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc., Adidas America, Inc., Barnstormers Basketball, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
High Bear v. Noel et al
as 6:2019cv02068
Defendant:
Barbara Westphal, Leah R Noel, Adam Heinrichs and others
Plaintiff:
Shelley High Bear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Licht v. Georgia Pacific Gypsum, LLC
as 3:2019cv03005
Plaintiff:
Scott H Licht
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Gypsum, LLC and Georgia Pacific Gypsum LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lasack v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Scott Lasack and Scott D. Lasack
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Naber
as 2:2018cv01021
Plaintiff:
Nancy Alice Jones and Scott Albert Jones
Defendant:
Francis John Naber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. Milosevic et al
as 5:2017cv04004
Plaintiff:
Barbara Scott and Everett Scott
Defendant:
Ivan Milosevic and US Expediters Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Dorn v. Hunter
as 4:2016cv00638
Plaintiff:
Edwin Van Dorn
Defendant:
Scott Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
