Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Keith v. Summers et al
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Keith
Defendant:
Summers, Smith, DeCastro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. USA
as 4:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Moon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ward v. United States Marshals et al
as 5:2023cv05061
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Ward
Defendant:
United States Marshals, Sheriff Kevin Thomm, Sheriff Brian Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Haynes et al
as 4:2023cv04115
Plaintiff:
La'Shane Donyale Scott
Defendant:
Dr. Aaron Haynes, Kayla Tinker, Responsible Clinician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Tripp v. Damguard et al
as 4:2023cv04105
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Respondent:
Judge Natalie Damguard, Judge Robbin J. Howman, Thomas Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2023cv04020
Plaintiff:
La'Shane Donyale Scott and La
Defendant:
Dr. Mary Carpenter, Warden Dan Sullivan, Nurse Lana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Lincoln County et al
as 4:2022cv04109
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Keith
Defendant:
Lincoln County, Sheriff, One Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davi v. Cook et al
as 4:2021cv04160
Plaintiff:
Scott William Davi
Defendant:
Darrin Young, Jessica Cook, Mary Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv04181
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Roderick Leon Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rindahl v. Noem et al
as 4:2020cv04176
Defendant:
M. Liedholt, L. Lenter, A. Madsen and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
