Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Martinaj v. Uhler
as 24-72
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BERNARDO MARTINAJ
Plaintiff:
JOHN AMANTE, ARISMENDI FABIAN, STEVE ARMENTO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD UHLER, Superintendent; Upstate Correctional Facility, JOSEPH BELLNIER, Deputy Commissioner, Correctional Facilities Operations, DONALD QUINN, First Deputy Superintendent; Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
STEVEN RACETTE, Superintendent; Clinton Correctional Facility, WIDDUN, CERT Officer, CERT OFFICER NO. 3441 OR 3448 and others
Stevenson v. Schiano Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Nathan Randell Stevenson
Defendant:
Charles A. Schiano Jr., Jennifer Kennedy, Joseph Damelio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vest et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2021cv10502
Plaintiff:
Robert Vest, Jose Vigil, Marvin Vinson and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Lilley v. Greene Central School District et al
as 3:2021cv00871
Plaintiff:
Jordon Lilley
Defendant:
Greene Central School District, Gordon Daniels, Brian Milk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinaj et al v. Uhler et al
as 9:2018cv00257
Defendant:
C.O. Shutts, Joseph Bellnier, CERT Officer No. 1537 and others
Plaintiff:
John Amante, Phillip Copeland, James Larney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv04551
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Scott Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Benesh et al v. Ramsay Ironworks, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00215
Plaintiff:
Harry Benesh, Peter Carriero, Peter Creegan and others
Defendant:
Ramsay Ironworks, Inc. and Quality Steel Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
